Love Is the Object(ive)…

In the interest of flow, I retain the unedited intuitive cadence for this piece. Some terms may not be immediately accessible, though I use language resonant with existing schools and traditions. Internal logic is sound, and I’ve included a brief summary and a key of terms at the end. I advise the reader to flow with this piece and read it as more of a meditation than analytical treatise…

The human mind-body system is an inverse and asymmetrical biologically contained reciprocal system Of the Whole. Its origin is not from the Whole, but Is the Whole. Its ‘distinction’ is a product of the ‘contained mind’, whose focus is the nature of its own limitation.

Believing in ‘it’self is required to singularly orient to lower dimensional forces (survival). Orienting one’s ‘personal self’ according to lower dimensional forces means to perceive the lower dimension with the level of faculties of the current dimension. In the case of the human person the awareness is a 3 dimensional perception as the reduction of its own dimension (3D) [appropriating time as the ‘experiential measurement’ of ‘movement’ along 2 dimensional spacial parameters (forward,back, left, right)] to linear (2D) information (past, future), and thus binary (for-against, life-death) along a planar substratum of space-time.

It is a *choice* to experience Earth along such a substratum. A *choice* freely made every ‘moment’ you orient your ‘self’ to the linear directionality of past and future. The task, should you *choose* to undertake it, is to learn to perceive *choice* in a higher dimensional manner.

Strictly speaking the human species is not evolving to higher dimensional beings so much as they are learning to orient themselves to the higher dimensional Nature of the Cosmic.

Higher dimensional orientation involves the inverse to the above. The 3D being must shift their perception from the 2D planar construct to the 4D Principle (Love). When the 3D being locates their perception 2 dimensionally in 3D space-time they are necessarily dropping the ability to locate their perception (awareness of) 3-dimensionality in 4D time-space to do so—collapsing it, if you will.

Free *choice* is the ability to shift location of perception. Fear orients perception to the future side of the planar substrate, and desire orients to the past. What is Truly ‘happening’ in 4D perception (Love) is only ‘happening’ in the Now moment. The Now moment can be seen as that moment which ‘I’ cannot find if I’m oriented to fear or desire, and that moment in which I Am located when I’m Not oriented to fear or desire.

Fear and desire are mediated by thoughts about these feelings. That is to say that when our intellect perceives time as linear, life as binary, then it makes decisions based on its orientation to fear and desire about their ‘position in space-time’, rather than living in the *choice* to make decisions from a ‘place in time-space’.

The spark between people when they ‘think’ (intellectualise that) they are in love exists in the absence of thoughts of fear and the presence of thoughts of desire (to varying degree and interaction). They have located one another in the planar substrate, and when they first meet, the absence of fear and presence of desire (neutralised polarity) between one another leads to mistaking ‘each’ ‘other’ for ‘objects’ of love, because they attribute the orientation of their thought to the feeling of Love. When two ‘object people’ become attached to one another in objective fashion they will use the intellect to filter (suppress/magnify) thoughts of fear and desire in a cognitive attempt to orient around the initial feeling (which was the brief contact with Love and which is commonly/mundanely referred to as love when the feeling is attributed to another person or ‘thing’).

The decision to ignore emotion/feeling in order not to orient one’s self via feeling in the planar substrate has the effect of ‘deciding’ on a single direction. It is a choice of linearity in an already linearly defined reality. A little like ‘trying to’ find one’s way around a dark room with a laser pointer. Objectification is intensified to maximal degrees in order to produce a finer and finer point of focus (of attention). With this is the desire to ‘figure out’ the dark room via calculating specific places in space-time (facts). This is no different to understanding our 3D bodies via MRI in cross-sectional slices. The MRI scan can ONLY be interpreted from the understanding of the 3 -dimensional body as the context (this is pure objectification).

The Truth of the 3 dimensional construct IS NOT and CAN NOT be determined from the 2 dimensional perspective (so NOT with binary (2D) perception). And furthermore, the 3 dimensional construct can only be understood from the 4 dimensional perspective. The 4 dimensional perspective is of 3 dimensional space along the axis (via the perception) of Love, and so the true 3 dimensional nature of our humanity can only be understood when one is centrally oriented around (about) the Feeling of Love.

When one is centrally oriented about the axis (Feeling) of Love, their *choices* are made ‘from’ this place. The more one’s perception is located about the axis of Love the ‘faster’ (or more coherently) they move through 3D planes along the axis of Love in flow with the common Objective of Existence (which is Love Itself).

Love is the Object(ive).

The choice to coordinate with Love is the desire for Truth, which is Love. The desire for Love as opposed to love is a desire to stay in One ‘place’ while Existence moves through Us (thus we move With Existence), rather than a desire to feel for love using the intellect to locate an idea of what Love ‘is’ (the idea of love is the search for Love using the binary intellectual function of ‘decision making’ as per an idea).

There can only be great ideas in this search, never great Love. Thus one searches the area of the planar construct ‘for’ Love, and in doing so moves away from it in search of it—this is the paradox. Ultimately it takes efforts of reason from all points of non-contact (separation) to ‘rationalise’ where Love (contact) may therefore be. And this is motivated by the ‘desire to find the feeling’ (idea of Love) rather than the Feeling Itself, which Is Love.

The Feeling Is.

AI is the invention of a tool to focus the intellect further, intensifying the laser pointer. When the laser pointer reaches full power it must be still in order to perceive what it is ‘looking’ ‘at’. The irony here will be that the stillness required will reduce the observation of the movement of the Universe to the single point in an idea (which is the 2 dimensional observation of the 3D construct which we call a fact). This, in effect is the most precise fact, and this will appear as ‘nothing’, and furthermore the ‘fact’ of this will seem ‘infinite’.. infinite nothingness.

The fact of the most precise fact.

Infinite nothingness as a fact (when believed) is merely the observation that no ‘thingness’ exists at the still point of observation. If we believe that we are ‘things’ while discovering ‘nothingness’ then this will invoke existential fear. But if the perspective can be taken that ‘thingness’ is the ‘illusion of the stillness’ required to observe it then we can potentially deduce in the inverse manner from this place (location) of still observation that when we observe by reduction we are making still, in an illusory fashion, the movement of the All. As such, rather than actually perceiving ‘nothing’ we are indeed observing Everything but our perception has essentially observed the exact (factual) manner in which the All is NOT Everything... that is to say the EXACT manner in which the All is not Itself, of which there are infinite ways to make this observation, and thus the illusion of infinite nothingness.

The answer is to stop mistaking rational observation (the desire to find Love) for the Actual Feeling of Love and to mutually conflate them instead—Which is to say to learn to reorient what we call observation to the perception of the All, which is the Feeling of Love, which is the Continual absence of 2D fear and desire, which can only be Felt.

The absence of fear and desire is not the absence of Feeling but the absence of the idea of feeling.

How do we look for this Feeling? … We don’t.

How do we find this Feeling? Not by looking for (desiring) the objective qualities of the apparent world, but rather by feeling for the Space between fear and desire, which then ‘recontextualises’ what we ‘think’ we’re observing to how we feel *about* what we are observing. BUT, again, what we feel NOT as ‘defined’ by what we fear or desire but HOW we fear or desire, where the desire for Love and the fear of the absence of Love are a unifying principle around a central location in time-space—this desire for Love and fear of absence of Love, the manner of ‘how’ we Love, is navigated via moral choice.

Moral choice is the ‘mechanism’.

Centrally locating ((to find)) in time-space means locating around (about) The Central Feeling (Love) while ‘space’ (the All) moves through Us. As opposed to centrally locating via space-time, which means traversing the substrate of the All (which is infinite possibility), piece by (infinite) piece via the inference of time looking for an idea of Love... which is ((to be lost)).

“I was lost but now I am found”

Supplementary

This piece explores how our usual, linear way of perceiving reality—limited by fear and desire—reduce the multidimensional richness of existence to a binary, flattened perspective. By consciously reorienting ourselves to the principle of Love, we can move beyond objectification, conceptual searching, and linear time, and instead inhabit a state of direct, felt connection with the Whole. Love, here, is not merely an emotion but a guiding axis of perception, revealing that genuine understanding and unity cannot be reached through intellect alone, but must be felt as a central presence animating every moment.

The central treatise stands as an intuitive exploration of Love and perception, written to resonate with those who already feel aligned with its themes. The following supplements are designed to broaden the reach of the work without altering its essence, providing practical analogies and expanded thoughts for those who wish to engage further.

Dimensional Collapse: A Practical Analogy

To understand the concept of dimensional collapse, consider a cube. A cube exists as a three-dimensional object, but when you hold it at the correct angle, centred on a corner, its outline becomes a two-dimensional hexagon.

To fully perceive the hexagon, you must stop focusing on the aspects that make it a cube—its depth, its three-dimensional structure. This does not mean the cube ceases to exist; rather, you collapse your perception of its higher-dimensional qualities to engage fully with the lower-dimensional outline.

This analogy illustrates a universal principle of perception: in order to engage with a particular dimensional framework, we must release focus on the aspects of the dimensions above or below it. Just as the cube’s outline simplifies its complexity into a flat shape, our perception of reality shifts when we orient ourselves toward a specific dimension.

This principle applies directly to the ideas in Love Is the Object(ive). When we fixate on the binary, planar substrate of fear and desire (a 2D construct), we collapse our ability to perceive the higher-dimensional axis of Love (4D). Conversely, to align with Love, we must let go of the constructs that bind us to the lower dimensions. In this way, dimensional collapse is not a loss but a deliberate choice to shift awareness, revealing new aspects of existence.

Moral Choice: The Mechanism of Alignment

At the heart of Love Is the Object(ive) lies the concept of moral choice as the mechanism for navigating dimensions of perception. Moral choice, as virtue, is not an abstract idea or a set of external rules; it is a deeply felt alignment with the axis of Love, guiding us away from the planar substrate of fear and desire.

Each moment presents an opportunity to choose. Fear and desire anchor us to linear, binary thinking—tied to past and future, separation and survival. Moral choice, by contrast, is a choice of alignment. It is the act of releasing these lower-dimensional anchors and orienting oneself toward the higher-dimensional principle of Love.

This alignment does not arise from thought alone but from an inner knowing, a felt resonance with the Whole. To make moral choices, to be virtuous, is to perceive not only the immediate consequences of an action but the broader harmony it brings into existence. It is to see the ripple of alignment with Love in the Now moment.

Moral choice, whether made well or otherwise, is literally the way we navigate from lower-dimensional perception to higher-dimensional awareness. It is the mechanism by which we move from fragmented observation to integrated Being. Every decision made in Love becomes a step toward alignment with the Living Principle.

Key Concepts and Terms

• Whole (Cosmic Oneness): The totality of existence, not something separate from us, but the very fabric of our being.

• Dimension of Perception: Humans often operate at a “lower dimension” where time is linear and experience is flattened into binary choices. Our animal/instinctual nature is binary, and we can shift to a higher-dimensional mode of awareness. In essence, a spiritual evolution.

• Linear (2D) vs. 3D vs. 4D Perception:

• 2D (Planar) Perception: Viewing life in terms of fear vs. desire, past vs. future, reducing complexity to binary logic.

• 3D Being: The human as a three-dimensional entity that tends to reduce its own multidimensionality due to habitual, linear thinking.

• 4D Principle (Love): A higher-dimensional axis of perception where Love is the central reference point. In 4D perception, one transcends linearity and experiences the Now as a timeless, unified presence.

Fear and Desire (3D vs 4D)

In 3D awareness (confined to the 2D linear substrate), fear and desire act as orienting forces that dislocate perception from the Now.

Fear projects into imagined futures.

Desire pulls from remembered pasts.

Both act to fracture presence, anchoring us in duality and binary reactivity.

But in 4D perception — when one is aligned with the axis of Love — these same forces take on a transformed function.

Fear (4D) becomes the fear of losing coherence with the Now moment.

Desire (4D) becomes the desire to stay aligned with it.

Here, fear and desire are no longer disruptive. They become refined tensions — not pulling us apart, but holding us to the centre. They serve coherence, not fragmentation.

Love vs. love:

• Love (Capital “L”): An ontological principle, a dimension of being in which the Whole is felt directly, without objectification.

• love (lowercase): The objectified, conceptual pursuit of affection or connection as “things” to obtain. This searching leads away from genuine contact with Love.

• Choice of Orientation: Each moment, one can choose how to perceive. Aligning with Love means feeling the whole rather than chasing partial aspects. This moral and perceptual choice shapes one’s reality. It is developed with continuous practise.

• Moral Choice as Mechanism: Moral choice isn’t just ethical behavior, but the means by which we navigate the subtle difference between fear-driven searching and Love-centered Being. The more aligned in Love, the more virtuous.

• Objectification and AI as Metaphor: The intellect’s drive for “facts” parallels how AI refines focus into an ever-sharper beam, potentially obscuring the living Whole. True understanding emerges not by further reduction but by embracing the multidimensional fullness revealed through Love.

Disclaimer on AI Use

The core text is written entirely by me, absent of any AI involvement, including editing. It is a deeply intuitive work, emerging directly from my own process of reflection and insight.

The supplementary materials, including the key and additional explanations, were developed with AI assistance to provide broader context and accessibility for readers in lieu of inline expansion.